Ah, Python! It’s such a wonderfully versatile language, isn’t it? Whether you’re wrangling data, analyzing logs, or even just processing text files, a very common task you’ll eventually encounter is needing to know the total number of lines in a file. Maybe you’re validating an import, gauging the size of a dataset, or simply tracking progress. Whatever your reason, getting an accurate line count in a file using Python is a fundamental skill, and happily, Python offers several elegant ways to achieve it.

But wait, it’s not just about picking *any* method; it’s about understanding which method is best for *your* specific situation. Are you dealing with a tiny configuration file, or a massive, multi-gigabyte log archive? The answer to that question dramatically influences the most efficient and Pythonic approach you should take. This comprehensive guide will meticulously walk you through various techniques, from the most straightforward to the highly optimized, helping you confidently determine how to get the total lines in a file in Python, no matter its size or complexity.

The Significance of Line Counting in Python

Before we dive into the nitty-gritty code, it’s worth pausing for a moment to consider why counting lines is such a frequently performed operation in the world of programming, especially when working with files. It’s far more than just a trivial exercise; it actually underpins a multitude of practical applications:

  • Data Validation: Ensuring that an exported or imported CSV file has the expected number of records.
  • Log Analysis: Tracking how many entries a server log generates over a period, perhaps to monitor activity or potential issues.
  • Progress Indicators: When processing large files, knowing the total line count allows you to display a “10 of 1000 lines processed” kind of progress bar.
  • Resource Management: Estimating memory or processing time needed for subsequent operations on the file.
  • Code Metrics: Counting lines of code (LOC) in source files, though this is often done with dedicated tools, the underlying principle is the same.
  • Pre-allocation: Sometimes, knowing the line count beforehand can help optimize data structures if you plan to load the file’s contents into memory.

So, as you can see, this seemingly simple task holds significant practical value. Now, let’s explore the various Pythonic ways to achieve it!

Method 1: Iterating Line by Line – The Memory-Efficient & Pythonic Approach

This is arguably the most recommended and common way to count lines, especially when you’re unsure about the file’s size or know it might be large. When you iterate directly over a file object in Python, it reads the file line by line, one at a time. This behavior is incredibly memory-efficient because it never loads the entire file into RAM simultaneously.

How it Works:

  1. You open the file using `with open()`, which ensures the file is automatically closed even if errors occur.
  2. You then iterate directly over the file object (e.g., `for line in file_object:`). Each iteration yields one line.
  3. A simple counter variable is incremented for each line encountered.

Specific Content Details & Steps:

Here’s how you’d typically implement this method to get the total lines in a file in Python:

def count_lines_iterative(filepath):
    """
    Counts the total lines in a file by iterating line by line.
    This method is highly memory-efficient for large files.

    Args:
        filepath (str): The path to the file.

    Returns:
        int: The total number of lines in the file.
        None: If the file is not found.
    """
    line_count = 0
    try:
        with open(filepath, 'r', encoding='utf-8', errors='ignore') as file:
            for line in file:
                line_count += 1
        return line_count
    except FileNotFoundError:
        print(f"Error: The file '{filepath}' was not found.")
        return None
    except Exception as e:
        print(f"An unexpected error occurred: {e}")
        return None

# --- Example Usage ---
file_path_example = "my_document.txt" # Replace with your actual file path

# Create a dummy file for demonstration
with open(file_path_example, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f:
    f.write("This is line one.\n")
    f.write("This is line two.\n")
    f.write("And this is line three.\n")
    f.write("Line four, with a trailing newline.\n")
    f.write("Line five, possibly without a trailing newline.") # No \n here

total_lines = count_lines_iterative(file_path_example)
if total_lines is not None:
    print(f"Iterative Method: The file '{file_path_example}' has {total_lines} lines.")

# Clean up the dummy file
import os
os.remove(file_path_example)

Pros:

  • Memory Efficient: This is its biggest advantage. It doesn’t load the entire file into memory, making it suitable for extremely large files (gigabytes or even terabytes).
  • Robust: Handles files of any size without causing `MemoryError`.
  • Pythonic: It leverages Python’s efficient file iterator mechanism.

Cons:

  • Performance for Very Small Files: For tiny files (a few KB), the overhead of the loop might make it marginally slower than methods that read everything at once, though the difference is usually negligible.

Method 2: Using `len(file.readlines())` – Simple for Smaller Files

If you’re absolutely certain that your file is small enough to comfortably fit into your system’s available RAM, this method offers a very concise and readable way to get the total lines. It works by reading all lines from the file into a list of strings, where each element is a line from the file, and then simply taking the length of that list.

How it Works:

  1. Open the file using `with open()`.
  2. Call the `readlines()` method on the file object. This reads *all* lines into a list.
  3. Use `len()` on the resulting list to get the count.

Specific Content Details & Steps:

Here’s how you can implement this approach to count lines in Python:

def count_lines_readlines(filepath):
    """
    Counts the total lines in a file by reading all lines into a list.
    Suitable only for small to medium-sized files due to memory consumption.

    Args:
        filepath (str): The path to the file.

    Returns:
        int: The total number of lines in the file.
        None: If the file is not found.
    """
    try:
        with open(filepath, 'r', encoding='utf-8', errors='ignore') as file:
            lines = file.readlines()
            return len(lines)
    except FileNotFoundError:
        print(f"Error: The file '{filepath}' was not found.")
        return None
    except MemoryError:
        print(f"Error: Not enough memory to read the entire file '{filepath}'. Use an iterative method.")
        return None
    except Exception as e:
        print(f"An unexpected error occurred: {e}")
        return None

# --- Example Usage ---
file_path_example = "my_small_document.txt"

# Create a dummy file
with open(file_path_example, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f:
    f.write("Line 1\n")
    f.write("Line 2\n")
    f.write("Line 3")

total_lines = count_lines_readlines(file_path_example)
if total_lines is not None:
    print(f"Readlines Method: The file '{file_path_example}' has {total_lines} lines.")

# Clean up the dummy file
import os
os.remove(file_path_example)

Pros:

  • Simplicity and Readability: It’s very straightforward and easy to understand at a glance.
  • Concise: Can be written as a single line of code.

Cons:

  • Memory Intensive: This is its significant drawback. For large files, `readlines()` will attempt to load the *entire* file content into your system’s RAM. This can lead to `MemoryError` and crash your application if the file is too big.
  • Performance Degradation: Even if it fits into memory, allocating and managing a very large list can still introduce performance bottlenecks.

Method 3: Using a Generator Expression with `sum()` – A Concise Memory-Efficient Alternative

This method is a beautiful blend of conciseness and memory efficiency, often considered quite Pythonic. It leverages a generator expression, which means it doesn’t create an intermediate list of all lines like `readlines()`. Instead, it yields one line at a time, and the `sum()` function simply adds 1 for each line yielded. This is effectively the same as Method 1 (iterating line by line) but in a more compact syntax.

How it Works:

  1. Open the file using `with open()`.
  2. Use a generator expression like `(1 for _ in file)`. This expression generates a `1` for each line it reads from the file, without storing the lines themselves. The `_` is a common convention for a variable you don’t intend to use.
  3. Pass this generator expression directly to the `sum()` function, which sums up all the `1`s, giving you the total count.

Specific Content Details & Steps:

Here’s how to implement this neat trick to count lines in a file in Python:

def count_lines_generator_sum(filepath):
    """
    Counts the total lines in a file using a generator expression with sum().
    This is a concise and memory-efficient method.

    Args:
        filepath (str): The path to the file.

    Returns:
        int: The total number of lines in the file.
        None: If the file is not found.
    """
    try:
        with open(filepath, 'r', encoding='utf-8', errors='ignore') as file:
            # The generator expression (1 for _ in file) yields 1 for each line.
            # sum() then adds these 1s up, effectively counting lines.
            return sum(1 for _ in file)
    except FileNotFoundError:
        print(f"Error: The file '{filepath}' was not found.")
        return None
    except Exception as e:
        print(f"An unexpected error occurred: {e}")
        return None

# --- Example Usage ---
file_path_example = "my_big_document.txt"

# Create a dummy file with more lines for better representation
with open(file_path_example, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f:
    for i in range(100): # 100 lines
        f.write(f"This is line number {i+1}.\n")
    f.write("The last line!") # No \n here

total_lines = count_lines_generator_sum(file_path_example)
if total_lines is not None:
    print(f"Generator Sum Method: The file '{file_path_example}' has {total_lines} lines.")

# Clean up the dummy file
import os
os.remove(file_path_example)

Pros:

  • Memory Efficient: Just like Method 1, it processes the file line by line without holding everything in memory.
  • Concise: Very compact and elegant code.
  • Readability (for experienced Python developers): Once you understand generator expressions, this is quite clear.

Cons:

  • Readability (for beginners): Might be slightly less intuitive for those new to generator expressions compared to a straightforward `for` loop.

Method 4: Utilizing `enumerate` – Another Iterator-Based Approach

While `sum(1 for _ in file)` is very popular, another common Pythonic idiom for counting occurrences in an iterable is to use `enumerate`. This method pairs each item in an iterable with a counter, and you can then simply take the value of the counter on the very last item. When applied to files, this still operates in a memory-efficient, line-by-line manner.

How it Works:

  1. Open the file using `with open()`.
  2. Use `enumerate(file)` to get pairs of `(index, line)` for each line.
  3. Iterate through these pairs, and the `index` will represent the line number (starting from 0).
  4. The `index` of the very last line, plus one, will be your total count. A common trick is to iterate to the end and get the last index.

Specific Content Details & Steps:

Here’s how you’d use `enumerate` to count the total lines in a file in Python:

def count_lines_enumerate(filepath):
    """
    Counts the total lines in a file using enumerate.
    This is also memory-efficient.

    Args:
        filepath (str): The path to the file.

    Returns:
        int: The total number of lines in the file.
        None: If the file is not found.
    """
    line_count = 0
    try:
        with open(filepath, 'r', encoding='utf-8', errors='ignore') as file:
            for line_count, _ in enumerate(file, 1): # Start counting from 1
                pass # We just need the loop to run to the end
        return line_count
    except FileNotFoundError:
        print(f"Error: The file '{filepath}' was not found.")
        return None
    except Exception as e:
        print(f"An unexpected error occurred: {e}")
        return None

# --- Example Usage ---
file_path_example = "my_another_document.txt"

# Create a dummy file
with open(file_path_example, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f:
    f.write("Alpha\n")
    f.write("Beta\n")
    f.write("Gamma")

total_lines = count_lines_enumerate(file_path_example)
if total_lines is not None:
    print(f"Enumerate Method: The file '{file_path_example}' has {total_lines} lines.")

# Clean up the dummy file
import os
os.remove(file_path_example)

Pros:

  • Memory Efficient: Similar to Method 1 and 3, it doesn’t load the entire file.
  • Clear Counter: The `enumerate` function explicitly provides an index, which can sometimes be clearer for debugging or if you need to perform other operations based on the line number.

Cons:

  • Slightly Less Direct: For just counting, `sum(1 for _ in file)` might feel more direct as it explicitly sums up ones.

Method 5: Employing `subprocess` (Leveraging System Utilities like `wc -l`) – Fastest for Very Large Files on Unix/Linux

When you’re dealing with truly enormous files – we’re talking gigabytes or even terabytes – and you’re operating on a Unix-like system (Linux, macOS, WSL), the fastest way to get a line count is often to delegate the task to the operating system’s native utilities. The `wc -l` command (word count, lines only) is incredibly optimized for this specific task. Python’s `subprocess` module allows you to run these external commands and capture their output.

How it Works:

  1. Import the `subprocess` module.
  2. Use `subprocess.run()` to execute `wc -l` command with your file path.
  3. Capture the standard output, decode it (it will be bytes), and convert it to an integer.

Specific Content Details & Steps:

Here’s how to use `subprocess` to count lines, especially effective for getting a fast line count in Python on Unix-based systems:

import subprocess
import platform

def count_lines_subprocess_wc(filepath):
    """
    Counts the total lines in a file using the 'wc -l' system command.
    Extremely fast for very large files on Unix-like systems.

    Args:
        filepath (str): The path to the file.

    Returns:
        int: The total number of lines in the file.
        None: If the file is not found or command fails.
    """
    if platform.system() == "Windows":
        print("Warning: 'wc -l' is a Unix/Linux command. This method might not work as expected on Windows.")
        print("Consider using a Python-native method or a Windows equivalent command (e.g., 'find /c /v \"\" file.txt').")
        # Example for Windows (less robust, often slower than Python iterative methods)
        # try:
        #     command = ['findstr', '/RNC:"^"'], filepath] # Or 'type file.txt | find /c /v ""'
        #     result = subprocess.run(command, capture_output=True, text=True, check=True)
        #     # The output for findstr is usually "---------- file.txt: N" or just "N" depending on version/locale
        #     # This parsing needs to be more robust. Let's stick to Pythonic for Windows.
        #     # For simplicity, returning None for Windows in this specific example.
        #     return None
        # except Exception as e:
        #     print(f"Error running findstr on Windows: {e}")
        #     return None

    try:
        # We use shell=True for simpler command string but be cautious with untrusted input.
        # input=b'' is added to prevent stdin from being inherited, which can cause hangs on some systems
        # if the subprocess tries to read from stdin.
        command = ['wc', '-l', filepath]
        result = subprocess.run(command, capture_output=True, text=True, check=True, input='')
        # The output of 'wc -l filename.txt' is typically "    12345 filename.txt"
        # We need to split and get the number.
        line_count = int(result.stdout.strip().split()[0])
        return line_count
    except FileNotFoundError:
        print(f"Error: Command 'wc' not found or file '{filepath}' not found.")
        return None
    except subprocess.CalledProcessError as e:
        print(f"Error executing 'wc -l': {e.stderr}")
        return None
    except ValueError:
        print(f"Could not parse 'wc -l' output: {result.stdout}")
        return None
    except Exception as e:
        print(f"An unexpected error occurred: {e}")
        return None

# --- Example Usage ---
file_path_example = "my_huge_log.txt"

# Create a dummy file (larger for subprocess demo)
with open(file_path_example, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f:
    for i in range(10000): # 10,000 lines
        f.write(f"Log entry {i+1}: Something important happened.\n")
    f.write("End of logs.")

total_lines = count_lines_subprocess_wc(file_path_example)
if total_lines is not None:
    print(f"Subprocess (wc -l) Method: The file '{file_path_example}' has {total_lines} lines.")

# Clean up the dummy file
import os
os.remove(file_path_example)

Pros:

  • Extreme Speed: For very large files, `wc -l` is often the fastest way to get a line count because it’s written in C and highly optimized at the OS level. It avoids the Python interpreter overhead for each line.
  • Minimal Memory Usage: The line counting is handled by the OS utility, consuming very little Python memory.

Cons:

  • Platform Dependent: `wc -l` is native to Unix-like systems. It won’t work directly on Windows without installing tools like Git Bash or WSL. Windows has `find /c /v “” filename.txt` but it can be significantly slower and trickier to parse.
  • Security Concerns (`shell=True`): If the `filepath` comes from untrusted user input, using `shell=True` can expose you to shell injection vulnerabilities. In the example, we use `check=True` and a list for the command to mitigate some risks, but generally, be cautious.
  • Less Pythonic: Relies on an external command, which deviates from pure Python solutions.
  • Error Handling Complexity: Parsing output and handling potential command failures can be more complex.

Method 6: Memory-Mapped Files (`mmap`) – For Advanced Scenarios & Huge Files

For truly immense files, where even line-by-line iteration might feel slow because you want to avoid sequential disk reads, memory-mapped files offer a powerful alternative. The `mmap` module in Python provides an interface to memory-mapped file objects. This effectively maps a file on disk directly into your process’s virtual memory space. Once mapped, you can treat the file as if it were a large string or byte array in memory, allowing for highly efficient random access and searching.

For line counting, instead of iterating lines, you would typically search for newline characters (`\n`) directly within the memory-mapped region. This can be significantly faster for very large files if the underlying OS implementation is optimized for such searches.

How it Works:

  1. Open the file in binary mode (`’rb’`).
  2. Create a memory map of the file using `mmap.mmap()`.
  3. Search for occurrences of the newline byte (`b’\n’`) within the mapped memory.

Specific Content Details & Steps:

Here’s a conceptual example of how you could use `mmap` to get the total lines in a file in Python. Note that this method is generally more complex and often overkill for typical line counting tasks unless performance on massive files is absolutely critical.

import mmap
import os

def count_lines_mmap(filepath):
    """
    Counts the total lines in a file using memory-mapped files (mmap).
    Efficient for extremely large files as it avoids explicit disk I/O for each line.

    Args:
        filepath (str): The path to the file.

    Returns:
        int: The total number of lines in the file.
        None: If the file is not found or cannot be mapped.
    """
    try:
        with open(filepath, 'rb') as file:
            with mmap.mmap(file.fileno(), 0, access=mmap.ACCESS_READ) as mm:
                # Count occurrences of newline character.
                # Adding 1 because the number of lines is usually
                # the number of newlines plus one for the last line,
                # unless the file is empty or has no trailing newline.
                # This assumes a standard text file with lines ending in \n.
                # An empty file or a file with no trailing newline needs careful handling.
                # For example, 'line1\nline2' has 1 newline, 2 lines.
                # 'line1\nline2\n' has 2 newlines, 2 lines. (wc -l counts this as 2)
                # 'line1' has 0 newlines, 1 line. (wc -l counts this as 1)
                # So, a simple count of '\n' and then adding 1 for the last line if not empty is common.
                
                # A robust approach for mmap counting is to explicitly check for final newline.
                # For simplicity here, we'll just count '\n' and adjust.
                
                count = mm.count(b'\n')
                
                # Adjust for files not ending with a newline.
                # If the file is not empty and the last byte isn't a newline, add 1.
                if mm.size() > 0 and mm[mm.size() - 1] != ord(b'\n'):
                    count += 1
                
                return count
    except FileNotFoundError:
        print(f"Error: The file '{filepath}' was not found.")
        return None
    except Exception as e:
        print(f"An unexpected error occurred with mmap: {e}")
        return None

# --- Example Usage ---
file_path_example = "my_gigantic_data.txt"

# Create a dummy file (very large for mmap demo, or at least many lines)
with open(file_path_example, 'w', encoding='utf-8') as f:
    for i in range(50000): # 50,000 lines
        f.write(f"Data row {i+1}: Some long string of information to simulate data.\n")
    f.write("Final data row.") # No trailing newline

total_lines = count_lines_mmap(file_path_example)
if total_lines is not None:
    print(f"Mmap Method: The file '{file_path_example}' has {total_lines} lines.")

# Clean up the dummy file
import os
os.remove(file_path_example)

Pros:

  • Extremely Fast for Large Files: By mapping the file into memory, it often allows the operating system to optimize disk I/O, potentially leading to faster searches for newlines compared to sequential reads.
  • Random Access: Once mapped, you can access any part of the file directly, which is useful if you need to do more than just count lines.
  • Memory Efficient (Virtual): While it occupies virtual memory space, the actual physical RAM usage is managed by the OS and only parts of the file that are accessed are typically loaded.

Cons:

  • Complexity: More complex to implement correctly, especially when considering edge cases like empty files, files without trailing newlines, or varying newline conventions (`\r\n` vs. `\n`).
  • Platform Specific Nuances: `mmap` behavior can have subtle differences across operating systems.
  • Overkill for Most Cases: For anything less than truly enormous files (hundreds of MB to GBs), the iterative Python methods (Method 1 or 3) are usually sufficient and simpler.

Performance Comparison and Choosing the Right Method

When you’re deciding how to get the total lines in a file in Python, performance is often a key consideration, especially as file sizes grow. Let’s break down the general characteristics of each method:

Method Memory Usage Speed Simplicity Best For Notes
Iterating Line by Line (`for line in file:`) Low Good High All file sizes, general purpose Standard, robust Pythonic approach.
`len(file.readlines())` High (loads all into RAM) Good (CPU, then `len()`) Very High Small files (KB to low MB) Avoid for large files to prevent `MemoryError`.
`sum(1 for _ in file)` Low Good High All file sizes, general purpose Concise version of line-by-line iteration. Highly recommended.
`enumerate` Low Good Medium All file sizes, general purpose Similar to line-by-line, slightly different syntax.
`subprocess` (`wc -l`) Very Low (OS-level) Excellent Medium Very large files on Unix/Linux External dependency, platform-specific, fastest for huge files.
`mmap` Low (virtual) Excellent Low Extremely large files, advanced scenarios More complex, often overkill for simple line counting. Requires binary mode.

Choosing Your Method:

  • For most common scenarios (files up to a few hundred MBs): Stick with Method 1 (Iterating Line by Line) or Method 3 (`sum(1 for _ in file)`). They are memory-efficient, Pythonic, and perfectly fast enough.
  • For truly massive files (multiple GBs or TBs) on Unix/Linux: Method 5 (`subprocess` with `wc -l`) is likely your best bet for raw speed.
  • For very small files (less than 10-20 MB), where conciseness is paramount: Method 2 (`len(file.readlines())`) is okay, but be aware of its memory footprint if the file unexpectedly grows.
  • For highly specialized performance tuning on enormous files, or if you need random access: Explore Method 6 (`mmap`), but be prepared for increased complexity.

Important Edge Cases and Considerations

When you’re trying to get the total lines in a file in Python, it’s not always as simple as counting newlines. Real-world files can throw curveballs. Here are some crucial points to keep in mind:

  • Empty Files: All the Python-native iterative methods (1, 3, 4) will correctly return `0` for an empty file, as their loops won’t execute. `wc -l` will also typically return `0`.
  • Files Without a Trailing Newline: A common scenario is a file where the very last line doesn’t end with a newline character. For example, a file containing just `Hello World`.
    • Python’s file iteration treats each newline-terminated sequence as a line. If the file ends without a newline, that last segment is still considered a line. So, `for line in file:` and `sum(1 for _ in file)` will correctly count this as one line.
    • `wc -l` on Unix-like systems, by design, counts the number of newlines and adds one if the file is not empty and doesn’t end with a newline. So it generally provides the “intuitive” line count.
    • `mmap` needs careful implementation to handle this (as shown in the example, counting `b’\n’` and then checking the last byte).
  • Encoding Issues: Always, always specify the file encoding (e.g., `encoding=’utf-8’`) when opening text files, especially if they contain non-ASCII characters. If you omit it, Python uses the default system encoding, which can lead to `UnicodeDecodeError`. Using `errors=’ignore’` or `errors=’replace’` can help you avoid crashing, but be aware it might silently skip or alter problematic characters.
  • File Not Found Errors: It’s good practice to wrap your file operations in `try-except FileNotFoundError` blocks to gracefully handle cases where the specified file doesn’t exist.
  • Very Long Lines: While not directly affecting the *count* of lines, if your lines are extremely long, methods that read lines into memory (like `readlines()` or processing single lines in a loop) might consume more memory per line than expected. However, for just counting, this is less of a concern than file size.

Best Practices for File Handling in Python

Beyond just counting lines, there are general best practices for file handling in Python that improve your code’s robustness and efficiency:

  1. Always use `with open(…)` Statements: This is paramount. The `with` statement ensures that the file is properly closed after its block is exited, even if errors occur. This prevents resource leaks and potential file corruption.
  2. Specify Encoding: As mentioned, always specify `encoding=’utf-8’` (or whatever your file’s actual encoding is) for text files to prevent encoding errors.
  3. Handle Exceptions: Implement `try-except` blocks, at minimum for `FileNotFoundError`, but also consider `IOError` or a general `Exception` for broader error handling.
  4. Contextual Choice: Select the line-counting method based on the expected file size and your operating environment (e.g., `wc -l` on Linux). Don’t use `readlines()` for files that could potentially be large.
  5. Relative vs. Absolute Paths: Be mindful of whether you’re using relative or absolute file paths. Relative paths are relative to where your script is executed, which can sometimes lead to `FileNotFoundError` if the execution context changes.

Conclusion: Python’s Flexible Approaches to Line Counting

So, there you have it! When you need to get the total lines in a file in Python, you’re certainly not short on options. Python, with its rich standard library and emphasis on readability, provides several effective ways to tackle this common task.

The key takeaway, if you remember nothing else, is this: for robust, memory-efficient line counting that works beautifully across all file sizes, opt for methods that iterate line by line, such as the simple `for line in file:` loop or its more concise cousin, `sum(1 for _ in file)`. These are the Pythonic workhorses for file processing.

For those rare, demanding scenarios involving truly enormous files on Unix-like systems, leveraging external tools like `wc -l` via the `subprocess` module offers unparalleled speed. And for the most intricate, performance-critical applications, delving into `mmap` can provide further optimization, albeit with increased complexity.

Ultimately, the “best” method to count lines is the one that fits your specific needs in terms of file size, performance requirements, and platform constraints. By understanding the pros and cons of each, you’re now well-equipped to make an informed choice and efficiently count lines in any file with Python!

How do you get the total lines in a file in Python

By admin